India’s Bipolar Economic Mood: How Geopolitics Crushes Small Entrepreneurs
India loves slogans. From “Make in India” to “Atmanirbhar Bharat,” every crisis births a new campaign. But behind the speeches and hashtags, small entrepreneurs are the ones paying the real price. Policies swing like a pendulum—one day it’s boycott China, the next day it’s handshake with Beijing. One month it’s cheerleading exports to the U.S., the next month tariffs smash those very exports. This inconsistency is not strategy—it’s survival whiplash.
The Golden Era of Chinese Imports
Before Covid, Indian e-commerce was a treasure chest for hustlers. Importing from China was almost a guaranteed formula:
- A product worth ₹100 in China could be sold for ₹500 on Amazon or Flipkart.
- Small traders became entrepreneurs overnight, building businesses from their bedrooms and garages.
- Marketplaces flourished because every seller fed their platforms with listings, ads, and logistics fees.
Entire communities thrived on this import game. From car accessories to kitchen gadgets, the “China to India” pipeline was the backbone of online retail.
Covid: When the Floor Fell Away
Then came 2020. Borders closed, shipments froze, and the world blamed China for the pandemic. The Indian government joined in, banning dozens of Chinese apps and urging citizens to shun Chinese products. The once-profitable import model collapsed overnight.
Small traders who had borrowed lakhs to fill warehouses were left stranded. Inventory dried up. Customers vanished. Dreams evaporated.
And just as sellers struggled to pivot, the government urged everyone to “be Atmanirbhar” and stop depending on imports. It was patriotic on the surface, but for small entrepreneurs, it meant: start over from zero.
Marketplaces Quietly Changed the Game
While sellers were told to give up Chinese imports, the marketplaces they relied on—Amazon and Flipkart—didn’t play by the same rules.
- They quietly created their own private labels.
- They worked through large affiliated sellers, importing Chinese goods in bulk.
- They undercut the very sellers who built their platforms.
A small seller couldn’t compete with the pricing power of Amazon itself. Slowly, many entrepreneurs were squeezed out. Some sold their brands to survive; others shut down entirely.
What began as a seller-driven ecosystem turned into a platform-dominated market. The very partners who once promised “seller success” became competitors.
India’s Love-Hate with China
Here’s the irony: while sellers were told to boycott Chinese goods, India’s trade with China never really stopped.
- By 2024, China was again India’s largest trading partner.
- Imports from China: over $120 billion (≈ ₹10 lakh crore).
- Exports to China: just around $18 billion (≈ ₹1.5 lakh crore).
- Deficit: close to $100 billion (≈ ₹8.3 lakh crore).
So the truth is simple: India never really quit China. It just made it harder for small entrepreneurs to access the supply chain, while big corporates and marketplaces continued to import without missing a beat.
America Turns the Screw
Just when Indian businesses started adjusting, a new shock arrived. In August 2025, the United States slapped tariffs of up to 50% on many Indian exports.
- Sectors like textiles, leather, gems and jewelry, machinery, and seafood were hit directly.
- The U.S. is India’s number one export destination, accounting for $80–85 billion (≈ ₹6.6–7 lakh crore) in 2024–25.
- Nearly half of India’s exports come from MSMEs, which means millions of small exporters now face shrinking orders and thinner margins.
Indian exporters paused shipments. Factories slowed down. Workers feared layoffs. And while the government promises relief packages, the damage is already deep.
Then vs Now: The Hard Numbers
| Year | Imports from China | Exports to U.S. | MSME Sellers on Amazon/Flipkart | Trade Mood |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | ~$75B (₹6.2 lakh cr) | ~$52B (₹4.3 lakh cr) | 3+ lakh active sellers, growing fast | “China pipeline booming” |
| 2020 (Covid) | Sharp fall | ~$50B (₹4.1 lakh cr) | Many wiped out due to import freeze | “Boycott China” + Atmanirbhar push |
| 2021–22 | ~$95B (₹7.9 lakh cr) | ~$60B (₹5 lakh cr) | Sellers squeezed by private labels | Platforms eating small traders |
| 2023 | ~$118B (₹9.8 lakh cr) | ~$75B (₹6.2 lakh cr) | Many independents shut or sold | Quiet return to China |
| 2024 | ~$120–126B (₹10–10.4 lakh cr) | ~$80–85B (₹6.6–7 lakh cr) | Consolidation, small sellers sidelined | India–China trade at record highs |
| 2025 (Now) | ~$125B+ (₹10.4+ lakh cr) | ~$80–86B (₹6.6–7.1 lakh cr) but hit by 50% tariffs | MSMEs battered, many exiting exports | “India swings again: handshake with China, clash with U.S.” |
The Cost of Policy Mood Swings
Every time India changes its stance, entrepreneurs bleed.
- In 2020, small importers were forced to dump Chinese suppliers in the name of nationalism.
- In 2022–23, they discovered marketplaces were importing anyway—just under different brand names.
- By 2024, India itself resumed deep trade with China, leaving those same entrepreneurs betrayed.
- In 2025, exporters hit by U.S. tariffs are now told to look inward, to focus on “self-reliance” once again.
This isn’t policy. This is a mood swing. And it’s no different from Trump’s infamous midnight tweets that could crash markets the next morning.
The Naked Truths No One Talks About
- Atmanirbhar was never designed for MSMEs. It was always tilted towards large corporates who could scale and lobby.
- China was never really out. Even at the peak of boycott rhetoric, large imports continued quietly.
- Marketplaces are not partners. They are competitors who will eat their own sellers if it suits their margins.
- Tariffs abroad kill MSMEs first. Big corporates can absorb shocks, lobby for relief, or pivot. Small exporters cannot.
What This Means for Indian Entrepreneurs
The impact is brutal and clear:
- Import traders have been wiped out by nationalism on one side and platform competition on the other.
- Exporters are now losing markets as tariffs in the U.S. make them uncompetitive.
- MSMEs, which form the backbone of Indian employment and trade, have no real safety net when geopolitics flips overnight.
India cannot claim to be building a global economic powerhouse while allowing its policies to swing so wildly that entrepreneurs can’t plan six months ahead.
A Path Forward
So what can entrepreneurs do in such chaos?
- Diversify markets: Don’t depend only on the U.S. or China. Explore ASEAN, Africa, and the Middle East where tariffs are lighter.
- Own your customer: Don’t rely only on Amazon or Flipkart. Build direct customer relationships with traceability, warranties, and brand identity.
- Strengthen supply chains: Continue sourcing from China if needed, but add backups in Vietnam, Thailand, and other “China-plus-one” nations.
- Focus on authenticity: With counterfeits and uncertainty everywhere, brands that prove authenticity and quality will survive the storm.
Final Thought
India’s real problem isn’t China or the U.S. It’s inconsistency. It’s telling entrepreneurs one thing today, doing another tomorrow, and expecting them to survive both.
Every time New Delhi changes its mood, an entrepreneur shuts shop. Every time global powers retaliate with tariffs, MSMEs crumble.
If India truly wants to become a superpower, it needs to protect its entrepreneurs with stable, long-term policies—not swing them around like pawns in a geopolitical game.
Because until that happens, India’s economic story will remain just that—a story.



