The Paradox of Performance: Why High-Achievers in Competitive Exams Struggle in Regular School Assessments

In the intense world of competitive exams like the IIT-JEE, NEET, and others, students are often molded into high-performance machines, honed to tackle complex problems under extreme pressure. These exams, which are gateways to some of the most prestigious institutions in India, demand not only a deep understanding of specific subjects but also lightning-fast problem-solving abilities. But a curious paradox emerges when these same high-achieving students sit for regular school exams: their scores often don’t reflect the same level of excellence. Why does this happen?

The Competitive Exam Conundrum

Competitive exams are designed to filter out the best from a vast pool of candidates. They are rigorous, time-bound, and focus heavily on the mastery of certain subjects—typically, math and science. Students preparing for these exams often enroll in specialized coaching classes, where they are trained to solve problems quickly and accurately. The environment is intense, the competition fierce, and the pressure immense. Over time, students become adept at this specific type of exam-taking, where success is measured by speed, accuracy, and a deep, narrow focus.

The Broader Horizon of School Exams

In contrast, regular school exams are designed to assess a broader understanding of the curriculum. These exams often include a wider range of subjects, requiring not just problem-solving skills but also the ability to express ideas clearly, write descriptive answers, and apply knowledge in practical contexts. Creativity, critical thinking, and a holistic understanding of the subject matter are valued. This broader approach can sometimes be at odds with the narrowly focused preparation students undergo for competitive exams.

The Shift in Focus

One reason high-achievers in competitive exams might struggle in regular school exams is the shift in focus. Competitive exams often prioritize a deep understanding of specific topics, leaving less room for a more comprehensive learning experience. School exams, on the other hand, require students to demonstrate a wider breadth of knowledge across various subjects, including humanities, languages, and the arts—areas that might be neglected in the relentless pursuit of competitive exam success.

Moreover, the skills required for competitive exams—such as rapid problem-solving and memorization of complex formulas—do not always translate well into the skills needed for school exams, which often emphasize analysis, writing, and long-form answers. The result is that students who excel in competitive exams may find themselves less prepared for the demands of regular school assessments.

The Psychological Toll

The psychological impact of this disparity cannot be underestimated. Students who have been trained to succeed in high-pressure environments may find regular exams to be frustratingly different. The shift from a high-stakes, speed-oriented mindset to a more reflective, expansive approach can be jarring. This can lead to anxiety, self-doubt, and a sense of inadequacy, especially if they are unable to replicate their competitive exam success in school.

In Kota, Rajasthan, a major hub for coaching centers preparing students for engineering and medical entrance exams, the extreme pressure has had tragic consequences. In recent years, there has been a disturbing rise in student suicides. As of 2024, reports indicate that over 20 students have taken their lives in Kota alone within the year, with many others across India experiencing similar fates. Studies have highlighted the intense stress and unrealistic expectations placed on these students, leading to severe mental health issues. This phenomenon is not isolated to Kota; other educational hubs in India have also witnessed similar tragedies. These alarming statistics call for urgent attention to the mental health and well-being of students, underscoring the need for systemic changes in how academic success is pursued and measured in the country.

Furthermore, the intense pressure to perform well in competitive exams can lead to burnout, making it difficult for students to maintain the same level of effort and focus for their schoolwork. The emotional and mental toll of preparing for these exams can result in a decline in overall academic performance, even in areas where the student may naturally excel.

Finding Balance

The key to addressing this paradox lies in finding a balance between the specialized preparation required for competitive exams and the broader learning needed for school success. Educational institutions and coaching centers need to recognize the importance of a well-rounded education that values both the depth of knowledge needed for competitive exams and the breadth of understanding required for school assessments.

Parents and educators must also be mindful of the pressures placed on students, encouraging them to pursue interests beyond the narrow confines of competitive exam preparation. By fostering a more holistic approach to learning, we can help students achieve not only in high-pressure exam settings but also in their overall academic and personal development.

Conclusion

The struggle of high-achievers in competitive exams to perform equally well in regular school exams is a reflection of the different demands these two types of assessments place on students. While competitive exams test a specific set of skills under pressure, school exams require a broader, more holistic understanding of the curriculum. Recognizing this difference and working towards a more balanced approach to education can help students thrive in both arenas, ensuring they are not just exam-ready but also life-ready.

However, the underlying issue extends beyond just the exam structure. The Indian education system, largely inherited from the British colonial era, was designed to produce a workforce suited for industrial development and administrative roles. This outdated system, focused on rote learning and rigid curricula, fails to equip students with the practical skills and creative thinking required in today’s dynamic job market. The result is a staggering statistic: nearly 90% of engineering graduates in India are considered unemployable due to a lack of practical training and relevant skills.

To address this crisis, the Indian government needs to overhaul the education system, shifting from a focus on theoretical knowledge to a more practical, skill-based approach. This includes integrating vocational training, encouraging critical thinking, and fostering innovation from a young age. Furthermore, the exodus of talent—where top Indian minds, such as Sundar Pichai (CEO of Google) and Satya Nadella (CEO of Microsoft), pursue education and careers abroad—highlights the need for better opportunities and resources within India. By reforming the education system to match global standards and investing in research and development, India can not only retain its talent but also position itself as a leader in innovation and technology. This shift is crucial to preventing brain drain and ensuring that the brightest minds contribute to India’s growth rather than seeking opportunities elsewhere.

Comments

comments