Counting begins tomorrow, Monday morning. Before the spectacle of results day — the anchors, the colour-coded maps, the shouting panels — let me put my analysis on the table right now, clearly, with names and numbers attached.
Across Kerala, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Assam, and Puducherry, India has just concluded one of its most consequential multi-state election cycles in a decade. Seven polling agencies released exit polls after the April 29 ban was lifted. Their ranges are, predictably, all over the place. That is the job of the exit poll — not to be right, but to be directional. I will extract that direction and sharpen it into a verdict.
Let us go state by state.
This is the most emotionally loaded result of the five. Pinarayi Vijayan’s LDF government was seeking something that Kerala had never delivered in modern history — a third consecutive term. The exit polls say it will not happen.
| Alliance / Party |
Exit Poll Range |
My Call |
Trend |
| UDF (Congress-led) |
69 – 94 |
83 |
|
| LDF (CPM-led) |
49 – 64 |
52 |
|
| NDA / BJP+ |
0 – 11 |
5 |
|
My Verdict
UDF wins. V.D. Satheesan becomes Chief Minister. Kerala returns to its alternating-government rhythm after LDF broke it once in 2021. Pinarayi exits not in disgrace, but in fatigue. A decade in power leaves marks.
What worked for UDF: Anti-incumbency is the oldest force in Kerala politics. Gold smuggling, financial controversies, and a perception of arrogance around Pinarayi’s inner circle eroded even ideologically committed LDF voters. The UDF ran a disciplined, grievance-channelling campaign without needing to offer much of its own. Satheesan kept his head down and let the government’s second-term fatigue do the heavy lifting.
What failed LDF: Pinarayi’s welfare delivery record was genuine. K-Rail controversy, however, became an anchor around their neck — a symbol of bulldozing consultation for ambition. The party could not find a narrative to escape it. And the CPM’s organisational machine, while still formidable, showed age in urban and semi-urban seats.
Future: LDF will have to find its post-Pinarayi identity now in opposition. The CPM faces a generational succession problem it has been deferring for years. The BJP continues to hover around 15–20% of the vote share without translating it to seats — a structural problem of Kerala’s FPTP math that will not resolve soon.
Tamil Nadu 2026 is a three-way story: a ruling DMK defending its mandate, an AIADMK trying to prove it still exists, and actor Vijay’s TVK making its historic debut. Most exit polls give DMK a comfortable win. One — Axis My India — predicts TVK will be the largest single party. That is the outlier I do not believe, but I will not dismiss it entirely.
| Alliance / Party |
Exit Poll Range |
My Call |
Trend |
| DMK+ (SPA) |
92 – 160 |
138 |
|
| AIADMK+ |
22 – 85 |
70 |
|
| TVK (Vijay) |
10 – 120 |
22 |
|
| Others |
— |
4 |
|
My Verdict
DMK wins. MK Stalin returns as Chief Minister. Tamil Nadu has historically rewarded incumbent governments that deliver welfare at scale, and Stalin’s government has done exactly that — Kalaignar Magalir Urimai, free bus travel, Naan Mudhalvan. The DMK’s welfare architecture became its vote armour.
The TVK question: Axis My India’s TVK-at-120 projection is the election’s most dramatic number. I do not buy it. First elections for new parties in Tamil Nadu’s FPTP system have historically produced seat tallies far below vote share — ask the AMMK. Second, TVK contested solo, without coalition arithmetic backing it. It will win between 18 and 25 seats. That is still a historic debut, and it plants Vijay firmly as the Opposition’s next pole in 2031.
What works for Stalin: Strong welfare delivery, a clean administration narrative relative to the AIADMK era, and a young, articulate communication style. He ran the government like a brand, and Tamil voters responded.
What fails AIADMK: EPS continues to consolidate the party, but the OPS split fractured the core Thevar vote bank. Without the BJP, AIADMK fought with its hands tied. They remain the single largest opposition bloc but are no longer a government-in-waiting — they are a party managing decline.
Future: Watch 2031. If Vijay’s TVK uses this term in opposition intelligently — building cadre, connecting with workers, filing meaningful legislative interventions — Tamil Nadu’s political map could look very different in five years. Stalin knows this. So does Udhayanidhi, who is being positioned clearly as the 2031 heir.
This is the biggest earthquake of May 4. If the exit polls are right — and the consensus here is unusually tight — India wakes up on Monday to its first-ever BJP government in West Bengal. That is not a small thing. That is a tectonic shift in Indian politics.
| Alliance / Party |
Exit Poll Range |
My Call |
Trend |
| BJP+ (NDA) |
146 – 175 |
157 |
|
| TMC (Mamata) |
110 – 135 |
128 |
|
| Left-Congress |
3 – 12 |
9 |
|
My Verdict
BJP wins. Suvendu Adhikari becomes Chief Minister. Bengal’s political violence culture, Sandeshkhali, the RG Kar case, and a record 91% voter turnout in Phase 1 tell the same story: voters came out to change a government. High turnout in Bengal historically benefits the challenger.
What worked for BJP: The BJP combined three things that rarely come together: a strong national machinery behind it, a localised narrative around Bengali identity and Hindu consolidation, and — critically — delimitation that reduced minority-heavy seats. The RG Kar rape-and-murder case became a moral referendum on Mamata’s government. No amount of welfare spending could absorb that outrage.
What failed TMC: Fourteen years in power. Syndicate culture. Corruption allegations that became impossible to rebut. Mamata’s personal brand remains formidable — she will likely retain her own Bhawanipore seat — but the machine around her rotted. The TMC also critically miscalculated: it governed like it had forever, when it should have governed like it had five more years to earn.
Why Suvendu Adhikari: He is the Leader of Opposition, has an Upper Caste Hindu consolidation base in South Bengal, and has been the BJP’s most aggressive field commander. He is not a consensus pick — there are BJP factions unhappy with him — but the BJP’s central leadership will likely push him through.
Future: This is where it gets interesting. Governing Bengal is vastly harder than winning Bengal. The BJP will face a hostile bureaucracy, entrenched TMC local bodies, and a Mamata-led opposition that will fight every inch from day one. The real test begins May 5.
Assam is the clearest result of the five. Every pollster, without exception, projects a BJP landslide. The only disagreement is in degree — whether it is 85 seats or 102. Himanta Biswa Sarma’s hat-trick is virtually certain.
| Alliance / Party |
Exit Poll Range |
My Call |
Trend |
| BJP+ (NDA) |
85 – 102 |
94 |
|
| Congress+ (INDIA) |
23 – 36 |
28 |
|
| Others (AJP, Raijor Dal) |
2 – 8 |
4 |
|
My Verdict
BJP wins decisively. Himanta Biswa Sarma continues as Chief Minister. Himanta ran Assam with an iron fist and a populist touch. That combination — however uncomfortable for liberal observers — delivered results on the ground that voters could feel.
What worked for Himanta: The delimitation of seats to reduce minority-dominated constituencies was politically surgical. Add to that his narrative of protecting indigenous Assamese identity from illegal immigration — a real concern in the state — and the BJP had a locally resonant platform that national BJP messaging amplified rather than diluted. His governance style also projected energy: cabinet meetings, scheme launches, announcements. He governs with the pace of a man who knows governance is his only campaigning tool.
What failed Congress: Gaurav Gogoi is a nationally credible face, but Assam’s Congress had not recovered its ground organisation after 2016. The “Three Gogois” dynamic — Gaurav, Akhil, Lurinjyoti pulling in different directions on Ahom community politics — split a vote that could have consolidated against the BJP. Congress could not decide whether it was fighting on anti-incumbency or on identity. It tried both and landed neither.
Future: Himanta’s next challenge is ambition management. He is clearly watching New Delhi too. A hat-trick in Assam cements his position as one of BJP’s most consequential chief ministers. Expect him to be a central figure in whatever BJP’s 2029 calculus looks like in the Northeast.
Small assembly, outsized complexity. TVK’s entry, Congress-DMK as INDIA bloc, and the AINRC-BJP combine competing in 30 seats where four or five seats decides everything. The exit polls are broadly aligned on the outcome, though the margins vary sharply.
| Alliance / Party |
Exit Poll Range |
My Call |
Trend |
| NDA (AINRC + BJP) |
16 – 25 |
19 |
|
| Congress-DMK (INDIA) |
4 – 12 |
9 |
|
| TVK + Others |
0 – 4 |
2 |
|
My Verdict
NDA retains Puducherry. N. Rangasamy continues as Chief Minister. The incumbent has the structural advantage in a 30-seat assembly. Congress-DMK failed to consolidate a credible alternative. TVK’s impact will be minimal — vote-splitting rather than seat-winning.
What worked for Rangasamy: He is a four-term Chief Minister of a Union Territory that is perpetually in institutional conflict with the Lt. Governor. That tension, paradoxically, makes incumbents look like fighters for local rights. His NDA alliance held together without fracture, and the BJP’s booth-level machinery compensated for AINRC’s thin cadre.
Future: Puducherry will continue to be a peripheral result in national political terms — but within Tamil Nadu’s political ecosystem, watch how TVK performs here. If Vijay’s party opens accounts even in a 30-seat assembly, it validates the “statewide force” narrative his teams are building. Two seats would be a qualified success.
The Bigger Picture
If these results hold, BJP will govern four of the five states and the union territory — Kerala being the exception where they remain shut out. That is an extraordinary consolidation of power at the state level at a time when the INDIA bloc was supposed to be building a counter-narrative.
West Bengal is the headline. It rewrites the political geography of India. For the BJP, it completes a saffron arc from Gujarat to Bengal — India’s western coast to its eastern heartland. For the INDIA bloc, it is a crisis that demands honest internal reckoning. Losing Bengal without a credible CM face, without a welfare counter-narrative, and with a TMC that ran an incumbent’s complacent campaign — that is a structural failure, not a cyclical dip.
Kerala, meanwhile, delivers what Kerala always does — a civilised alternation that makes political analysts look wise for predicting it. The LDF’s loss is not a collapse. It is a democratic rotation. The CPM will regroup. Pinarayi will step back. Kerala will continue to be Kerala.
Tamil Nadu is the quiet anchor. DMK’s return proves that a state can simultaneously run strong welfare and maintain developmental ambition. It also proves that Vijay — as a political force — is real, but not yet ready to govern. He will be in 2031. And that should concern everyone on Tamil Nadu’s political spectrum who is not already building a response to him.
Check back on May 4 evening. I have a feeling these numbers will hold.