When a Taxpayer Collapses, Does the System Even Notice?

Every budget season, we are reminded that paying taxes is a patriotic duty. Nation-building. Infrastructure. Welfare. Growth. The speeches are polished, the slogans inspiring. But the real test of any tax system is not how much it collects when citizens are strong — it is what it does when they are broken.

A recent story from Bengaluru makes that failure painfully visible.

Anuradha Tiwari, a Bengaluru-based founder, wrote about his neighbour, Raghu. Not a billionaire. Not a beneficiary of any scheme. Just a salaried professional who spent his life working in an MNC, paying his taxes honestly, month after month, year after year.

Then life collapsed.

Raghu lost his job.
Soon after, he suffered a cardiac arrest.
He is now recovering in a hospital bed.
At home, he has school-going children and a wife who needs regular dialysis.

He cannot work for the foreseeable future.

This is not a rare story. This is the nightmare every middle-class Indian quietly fears.

For decades, Raghu paid nearly 40–50 percent of his income in taxes. No evasion. No shortcuts. He did exactly what the system expects from its most reliable citizens.

And when everything fell apart?

No government agency stepped in.
No income protection.
No emergency medical support.
No institutional safety net.

Just hospital bills. Fear. And silence.

This is where the uncomfortable question begins:

What is the purpose of high taxation if it disappears precisely when life becomes unlivable?

In theory, taxes are supposed to create collective security.
In reality, for India’s salaried middle class, taxes often create only collective helplessness.

If you are poor, there are schemes.
If you are rich, there are options.
If you are middle class, there is only resilience — and your savings.

We are the easiest people to tax.
Income deducted at source.
No negotiation.
No escape.

But when we fall sick, lose jobs, or face prolonged crises, the system behaves like a distant landlord: happy to collect rent, unavailable during floods.

And then comes the argument:
“At least in India, treatment is faster than in the West.”

This is partly true — and dangerously misleading.

In countries like the US and Canada, patients often face long waiting times for specialist care. In Canada’s public system, people wait months for surgeries. In parts of Europe, patients die while waiting in queues for critical procedures. Even in the UK’s NHS, delayed treatments have become a national crisis.

But here is the difference.

In those countries, the delay is a failure of capacity.
In India, the failure is of access.

In Canada, you may wait — but you are covered.
In the UK, you may suffer delays — but you are not bankrupted.
In the US, the system is flawed — but unemployment insurance and disability support still exist.

In India, you often get:

Fast treatment — if you can pay.
Slow death — if you cannot.

And almost no income protection if illness and job loss happen together.

We like to mock Western healthcare queues.
But at least there, citizens can ask: “Why am I waiting so long?”
Here, millions silently ask: “Why am I paying at all?”

A tax system is not judged by highways and airports alone.
It is judged by what happens when a taxpayer lies on a hospital bed with no salary, no strength, and no safety net.

Raghu’s story is not a medical tragedy.
It is a policy failure.

Cardiac arrests happen.
Job losses happen.
But abandonment after decades of contribution should not happen.

High taxation without visible protection does not create a welfare state.
It creates a broken contract.

And when enough middle-class families realise that their relationship with the state is purely one-sided, something far more dangerous than fiscal deficit begins to grow.

Not anger.
Disillusionment.

Because a nation that cannot protect the people who paid for it, slowly loses the moral right to keep collecting.

Comments

comments